twitter-bird2 facebook-logo-square rss-cube

Useful Links

Homeowners 

Mary M. LeDoux Lake Charles, LA

Saxon reduced my interest and increased my principle by over $10,000. I had to agree to the "Modification" or lose my ...

Read more

Lloyd D Knoxville Tn

OOPS the bank could've been making that rent money for 2 years,instead they make me lose everythig ecept my ...

Read more

Jason L. - TN

I never really thought of myself as anyone other than someone who would make his monthly mortgage payments until the ...

Read more

Joy Carter Minor, Moss Point, MS

Early January 2011, I received a call that my home was being entered by people without my permission. The ...

Read more

Rocky & Brenda C. Cave Creek Arizona

As we seek legal counsel (we're pleading for Terry Goddard's help – he only stepped down from his AG post ...

Read more

Michael H. Quay Pahoa, HI

I am still in shock and it seems like a nightmare! ONLY THREE PAYMENTS behind and I also had ...

Read more

Andrea Allan 254 Lyons Plains Rd. Weston, CT.

  I've lost my business, my home, and am in debt.  Also PHH sent in negative 9 times to Experian ...

Read more

Larry Bradshaw, Fort Myers, Florida

  This appears to be clear and convincing evidence of a “conspiracy to commit fraud” (cover up), a fraudulent act ...

Read more

Melissa Ramont, La Mesa, CA

Ok, so my situation is not as devastating as some of the other stories I've seen and heard.  But it ...

Read more

Bob Cape Coral, FL

I called and complained and a week later I had keys sent to me for the new locks.  They ...

Read more

Ron B. - Penn

The whole 8 months of this was just a circus of lost papers, noone at BAC working from the ...

Read more

Tweets

shamethebanks's avatar
ShametheBanks shamethebanks
  • followers:
    908
Loading...

Last 2 tweets from shamethebanks:

Share/Save/Bookmark

Dear GMAC/MGIC,

As you know, the above-listed property is scheduled for foreclosure on April 12th. I think we can all agree that going through with this is not in anyone’s best interests for obvious reasons. Everyone from the investor (Freddie Mac) to GMAC, MGIC, and ourselves stand to lose—and lose big—if the property is foreclosed on.

I informed GMAC about my ongoing financial hardships in January of 2009, before we defaulted on the loan. At the time, GMAC said that I did not qualify for assistance because my income was insufficient (which is why I asked for help in the first place!) GMAC then offered us an awful in-house modification followed by a “Making Home Affordable” modification that used an incorrect income calculation. A foreclosure attorney reviewed the case and told me that I could take action against GMAC for doing this, an option I reserve the right to pursue.

Having been given no other choice, I listed the home for short sale in early December with Chris Toogood of John L. Scott Realty in Ashlsand, Oregon. The initial listing price was $325,000 and the price has been reduced each month. The current price is $230,000 and there still have been no offers on the property despite the drastic reductions despite the property being in excellent condition. This can only mean that the auction price is going to be even lower, or that GMAC will have to carry a vacant property on its books.

I think we can all agree that this makes no financial sense for anyone.

I am writing today to offer you a solution that will:

  • Stop the foreclosure.
  • Allow GMAC to continue to legitimately carry the property on its books at full value.
  • Prevent MGIC from having to pay out on the PMI policy listed above.
  • Allow MGIC to keep collecting the insurance premium on the property.
  • Allow the investor to continue making money on the original loan.
  • Preserve neighboring property values.
  • Preserve the local tax base.
  • Let us keep the home we have invested so much of our time, energy, and money in over the last 9½ years.

In short, I am offering a win-win-win solution.

Here is what I propose:

  1. The loan balance is currently about $400,000, including interest, late fees, etc., which is about $40,000 more than the principal balance of just under $362,000. The idea of paying interest on the back interest and fees smacks of loan sharking, but let’s move forward with the $400,000.
  2. Accept an interest-only payment at a 2% annual rate, which is competitive with today’s jumbo CD rates that range from 1.10 to about 2.95%. This gives you a payment of $667 per month.
  3. Adding taxes of about $285 and PMI of about $288 plus insurance of less than $50 per month provides a total monthly payment of $,1290 per month.
  4. Payments fixed for 5 years. At the end of that time, the original loan resumes at its original terms for its remaining term.

 

This gives GMAC/Freddie Mac an additional $40,000 in interest payments over the original loan and gives everyone the benefits outlined above.

Alternatively, you could consider a 3% interest-only payment on the principal balance of $362,000, which gives you a monthly payment of $905, or $54,300 in interest over the same 5-year period. In other words, by not asking for interest on top of interest, you get more money.

This solution requires no principal forgiveness, entails no loss to the investor, and salvages an otherwise rotten situation for everyone.

As further incentive, a copy of this letter and your response will be provided to the Huffington Post, www.shitheadery.com, www.shamethebanks.org, the Ashland Daily Tidings, the Medford Mail Tribune, and other interested media. I will also see to it that the home’s new owner knows the story in detail.

In summary, you can accept a profitable offer and earn immeasurable goodwill in the process… or not.

Anthony Hernandez



Add this article to your favorite Social Bookmarking sites

Newer news items:
Older news items:

Comments  

 
#3 I am so sorryBarbara 2010-04-21 06:45
Me too Anthony. If you have the energy, I surely hope you are pursuing legal retribution after this. I am hearing more and more really bad stories about GMAC.
Quote
 
 
#2 I am so sorry, AnthonyAlicia 2010-04-16 03:04
The same thing may happen to us. These pigs are bound and determined to take the properties. They have no interest whatever in helping the homeowner, even if it benefits them as well. They want that loss, and the resultant quick cash from the government.

Greedy pigs.
Quote
 
 
#1 pissed off former homeownerAnthony 2010-04-14 13:21
We turned in a short sale offer.

I sent in the above letter with a VERY profitable offer for the bank.

And the [censored]ers still foreclosed.
Quote
 

Add comment

People have been courageous and open in telling their story. We expect the same from you when you comment and that you use your name - NOT your screen name.
If this is still confusing to you, please refer to the rules of this site. The Rules
Unregistered comments will be moderated before being posted.
Your e-mail is required, but it will not be published. We value your privacy.


Security code
Refresh

Headlines

Latest comments

Designed & Developed
by
Zombeck.com

Search Engine Submission - AddMe